This solution is mix of HEBP (a soft chelating

This examination gives the insightful knowledge of
the proceeding of smear layer abolition capability of conventional irrigation
protocol and continuous soft chelating irrigation protocol. The main principle of
shaping is to boost satisfactory irrigation, disinfection, and obturation. Accumulation
of smear layer is noticed while shaping of root canal which ought to be abolish
with the help of irrigating solution. Whole activity needed from an irrigant to
reduce smear layer from dentin wall cannot be obtain by any sole irrigating
solution. Therefore, combined application of multiple irrigating solutions is obligatory
for optimal abolition of smear layer (5).Whereas Chloroquick solution is mix of
HEBP (a soft chelating agent) and NaOCl which can disinfect root canal as well
as reduces smear layer. Highlight of such combination of NaOCl and Etridonic
acid is that the NaOCl doesn’t surrender its biological, antibacterial and
tissue dissolving properties (13, 14), whereas the reduction and elimination of
the inorganic element is done with help of HEBP (11, 12).

Outcome of this current research demonstrate eradication
of smear layer was more decisive in middle and coronal third in comparison to
apical third. These results are in accordance with study done by Abbott PV, Heijkoop PS et al. and numerous studies, which have proved in past that
an effective cleaning action in the middle and coronal third of the root canals
even with numerous irrigation solutions, different volume, and time (15, 16).
In coronal and middle third areas where a larger canal diameter allows better
flow of solution and more time to be in contact with dentine wall which allows the
solution to remove smear layer comprehensively. (3,16).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

            Role
of surfactant has been discussed by many authors, in present study SmearClear,
SmearOFF and Chloroquick have surfactant in the solution. Abou-Rass and
Patonaiconfirmed that reduction of surface tension of endodontic solutions
improved their flow into narrow root canals (17). Therefore, an addition of
surfactants to irrigation solution should improve its penetration into apical
narrow part of root canal. In present study, SmearClear and SmearOFF despite
having additional surfactant doesn’t show the significant removal of smear
layer in apical third when compared to control group of 17% EDTA, which does
not have any addition surfactant. This result is in accordance with the
observationsof Lui et al. (18) and also, other studies have shown that calcium
chelating ability of solution is not improved by reducing the surface tension
of the solution.

            Present
study results disply that the continuous soft
chelating irrigation shows thesignificantly better removal of smear layer than
conventional irrigation protocol at apical third level when 18% HEBP was used
in combination with 5.25% NaOCl (Chloroquick High). Where 9% HEBP in
combination with 3% NaOCl (Chloroquick Low) did not show any significance
difference compared to conventional irrigation protocol groups. These resultscan
be attributed to chelating agent being more time in canal and also chelating
procedure is seen while instrumentation, unlike conventional irrigation
protocol where removal of smear layer is done only once instrumentation is
completed (19). Paque et al. demonstrated that the accumulation of hard tissue
debris in root canals when irrigated withamalgamation of  NaOCl and HEBP was significantly less than irrigation
was performed with 2.5% NaOCl alone (20).Another advantage of this combination
is that it has better tissue dissolution capacity by keeping the hypochlorite-
hypochlorous acid equilibrium towards hypochlorite (21). This combination is
affective on inorganic as well as organic part of smear layer at same time.

            Result
of this study is in contrast to the recently published study by Aby
Kuruvilla et al. where 7%malic acid was
more effective in removing smear layer as compared to 17% EDTA and 18%
etidronic acid (22). This observation may be seen because 18% etidronic acid which
is soft chelating agent was merely used in a final rinse irrigation protocol.

 There are
very few studies available on use of the continuous soft chelating agent for
smear layer removal. In present study, continuous soft chelating irrigation
protocol shows promising results.