The antagonistic effects on the progression and life prospects

The kids having a relationship withtheir folks is critical and imperative. Parenthood focuses on the crucialbuilding blocks which are essential for mankind to flourish. They act as thejustification for the rights and obligations of parental guardians.

In theparent-child relationship, there are a couple of such interests in play,including mental prosperity and support of an intimate relationship. However,the absence of such care routinely has to a great degree antagonistic effectson the progression and life prospects of a youngster. Recently, Anytown’s Department of Joband Family Services implemented new policy focus on any family unit that has atleast one reported offense of domestic violence, drug abuse or alcohol relatedcrimes committed by parental guardian, will bring about the expulsion of theyoungster from the home. The child will be put being taken care of by thestate, or child care administrations, until the point when documentation can beshown that offender has undergone any or all of the following programs, and hasthus been “offense free” for a period of no less than six months. The programsthey would have had to attend are alcohol and drug treatment, family therapy, mental health treatment, anger management, life skills classes, and childparenting classes (“Social Learning Theory:Properly Applied or Just an Excuse?”, 2018).Inorder to address ethical or moral issues that could arise fromimplementing this new policy wewould have to look at the effects of parental separation on the child. Theexpulsion of a child from their caregiver to whom they are connected, has bothpositive and negative viewpoints.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

From the child services point of view, removinga child from their parents or caregivers has a few advantages, the strongestadvantage is the wellbeing of the kid. A separation would, allow guidelines tobe established to monitor parental conduct, and the youngster mayget the message that society will ensure him or her, regardless of whether theparent won’t. A partition of parent and child would briefly liberate the guardiansfrom the weight of raising kid, enabling them to concentrate on the essential improvementsthat’s required for the youngster to return home. Isolating a parent and child canlikewise have significantly negative impacts. Notwithstanding research hasshown that expellingyoungsters from their homes interferes with their growth.

The more horrible the separation,there is greater probability the child would have significantdevelopmental issues (“Effects of Separation on Young Children:Implications for Family Court Decision Making”, 2018). Repeatedly removing the child from their parents interferes with the youngster’scapacity and ability to have intimate relationships. Youngsters who haveexperienced awful partitions their folks may likewise show low confidence, ageneral doubt of others, immaturity and lacking social aptitude.

 The behavioral reactions of kids who witnessaggressive behavior at home, they may acting out, be withdrawal, or anxiousnessto please. The kids may show nervousness and have a limited attention spans,which may bring about poor school grades and participation. They may likewiseutilize violence to communicate with friends or parents (“Effects of Domestic Violence on Children”, 2018).

  The long term effects of living aggressive orviolence household would lead to drug or alcohol abuse, and adolescentdelinquency. Their juvenile delinquency could lead to more serious crimes as theytranscend to adulthood. According to research conducted by National Center for Post-traumatic stress disorder or (PTSD) more than 33% of young ladies and young men cross thenation over ages 10 to 16 years are casualties of direct violence. Includes attemptedkidnapping, physical abuse, rape or sexual abuse. Considerably more childrenhave confronted community violence. That is, they have seen violence or theyknow a victims of community violence.  Inone study, more than 75% of children in a high-violence urban neighborhoods reportedcoming into contact with community violence. Of note, majority of t the parents said that their children had not been exposedto violence in the community (“Community Violence: Effects onChildren and Teens – PTSD: National Center for PTSD”, 2018).

  Ican see an incentive to want remove children from hostile environments whetherit’s in their parents’ home or the communities they live in. However, there areadverse effects either way. I understand that society has mission to protectits citizens but sometime implementing certain policy presents more issues thenthey solve.Did the Department ofJob and Family Services misinterpret or misapply the social learning theorywhen planning and implementing the policy?  In order this question I first have to define social learning theory. Sociallearning theory is a theory of learning and social conduct which recommendsthat new behaviors can be procured by watching and mimicking others. Itexpresses that learning is a psychological procedure that happens in a socialsetting and can happen absolutely through perception. Notwithstanding theperception of conduct, happens through the perception of prizes anddisciplines, a procedure known as vicarious fortification.

At the point when aspecific conduct is rewarded routinely, it will no doubt endure; on the otherhand, if a specific conduct is continually rebuffed, it will in all probabilityhalt (Nugent, 2018).