Randomness in ArtEven now,with science determined on the definition of the randomness as a non-repeating,unbiased, non irritant sequences of value, our expectation about chance, causeand other effective contention with facts.
The randomness is everywhere. No matter where you look, from polished asphalt particles to tile colors in your bathroom, there are all kinds of things in the world without rhyme or reason. Of course, randomness has become a formof art itself. Hundreds of random artists have thousands of random pieces of art in galleries and museums around the world.Coincidence is not a new concept. For example, the random selection method, in fact, the image of a lot of the helmet because of Homer’s Iliad. Even in the pre-Newton dialect of the 17th century, associated with the causes and necessities, a distinction was made between the events that seemed random, but only unpredictable, and the events that were really random.
The randomness inside a closed system of a digital computer, where all forces are known and measurable, will suddenly decrease or volatile. For this reason, it is said that the function of generating random numbers in computer languages ??gives more “mock-random” than a “really random” resultThe designer’s feelings should not be ignored although an inability to articulate their source. In an radio interview conducted in 1950, Jackson Pollock said a clear conversation distinction between the lack of randomness and Classical in his work. The interviewer implied that his works required any order by considering that it is not possible to control the paint while using a stick instead of a brush.
Pollock replied that “No, I don’t think so. With the experience, it seems to be possible to control the flow of paint to a great intensity and I don’t use the accident because I deny the accident.” Although Pollock contionue this kind of psychological sloth, he doesn’t mean that the randomly generated values in art and design have no place.